Summary: The mTOR complex 2, mTORC2, is a critical downstream effector of PI3K that stimulates AGC kinase members, including AKT, PKC, and SGK. Liu and colleagues reported that the pleckstrin homology domain of SIN1, an essential component of mTORC2, directly binds the PI3K product PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to promote mTORC2 kinase activation and membrane localization, thereby revealing a mechanistic link between PI3K and mTORC2. Cancer Discov; 5(11); 1127–9. ©2015 AACR.
See related article by Liu and colleagues, p. 1194.
mTOR is a central cell growth–modulating kinase in all eukaryotes. mTOR exists in two different complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, which are distinguished by unique accessory proteins RAPTOR and RICTOR, respectively. In addition, SIN1 is also a component uniquely present in the mTORC2 and is required for mTORC2 complex formation and function (1–3). Compared with the well-defined regulation and function of mTORC1, mTORC2 is less understood. AKT/PKB, a member of the AGC kinase family, is a key signaling hub in the PI3K pathway and regulates multiple cellular processes, such as growth, proliferation, metabolism, and survival. AKT is one of the most important substrates of mTORC2, which promotes AKT activation by directly phosphorylating its hydrophobic motif (S473), a site required for AKT maximum activation (4). Phosphorylation at S473 primes AKT for further phosphorylation at T308 in the catalytic domain by PDK1, thus leading to full activation of AKT. mTORC2 also phosphorylates other AGC kinases, including serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (SGK; ref. 5) and protein kinase C (PKC; ref. 6). It is generally accepted that mTORC2 is activated by growth factors via PI3K signaling; however, the precise molecular mechanism of mTORC2 activation remains elusive thus far.
Accumulating evidence suggests that SIN1 may play a key role in the regulation of mTORC2. It was found that alternatively spliced SIN1 isoforms in the cell define distinct mTORC2 pools; of these, only two are regulated by insulin (1). This suggests that SIN1 may function as a mediator between growth factor signaling and mTORC2. SIN1 contains a phospholipid-binding pleckstrin homology (PH) domain that may facilitate the association of mTORC2 with membranes (7).
Recently, Wei and colleagues reported that mTORC2 complex is directly regulated by mTORC1–S6K axis through SIN1 phosphorylation (Fig. 1; ref. 8). Phosphorylation of SIN1 at T86 and T398 by either S6K or AKT dissociates SIN1 from mTORC2, thus resulting in mTORC2 inhibition. Importantly, the authors also demonstrated a link between SIN1 phosphorylation and a cancer-derived mutation in SIN1 R81T, providing clinical significance of SIN1 phosphorylation in cell growth control. The R81T mutation attenuates SIN1 T86 phosphorylation and sustains mTORC2 activity and AKTS473 phosphorylation upon physiologic stimulation, thus bypassing SIN1 phosphorylation–mediated negative regulation of mTORC2 activity in response to upstream PI3K activation (Fig. 1; ref. 8).
In the current issue of Cancer Discovery, Liu and colleagues from the same group reported a direct molecular mechanism through which SIN1 regulates mTORC2 kinase activity by PI3K signaling (Fig. 1; ref. 9). Although SIN1 is required for mTORC2 integrity and kinase activity, surprisingly the authors found that the PH domain of SIN1 actually binds to the mTOR kinase domain and inhibits mTOR-dependent AKTS473 phosphorylation. Overexpression of the SIN1-PH domain is sufficient to suppress the phosphorylation of AKTS473. Interestingly, substitution of AKT-PH with SIN1-PH was able to functionally reconstitute the phosphorylation of AKTS473, indicating that the SIN1-PH domain shares a similar biochemical property as the AKT-PH domain, which is capable of binding PtdIns(3,4,5)P3.
Inspired by the mechanism of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-mediated AKT activation, the authors indeed demonstrated that PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, a product of PI3K at the plasma membrane, is able to interact with the SIN1-PH domain (Fig. 1). By comparing the AKT1-PH/Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 crystal structure with a computer modeling of the SIN1-PH/Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 structure, the authors identified three critical residues, including R395, K428, and K464, that mediate PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 binding to SIN1-PH. Mechanistically, increased PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 levels upon insulin or growth factor stimulation compete with the mTOR kinase domain in binding to SIN1-PH, and thus release the SIN-PH inhibition on mTORC2 activity. Moreover, PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 association with SIN1-PH is also responsible for the recruitment of mTORC2 complex to the plasma membrane where mTORC2 can phosphorylate membrane-associated AKT or other physiologic substrates.
The significance of this study is further expanded by genetic analysis of cancer-associated mutations in the SIN-PH domain. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas database revealed several somatic mutations in the SIN1-PH domain. Biochemical characterizations showed that these cancer-associated mutations compromise SIN1-PH binding to the mTOR kinase domain, thereby leading to increased mTORC2-dependent AKTS473 phosphorylation (Fig. 1). Among these mutations, D412G shows the most robust enhancement of mTORC2 activity even under nonstimulation conditions, thus identifying a key residue important for interaction with the mTOR kinase domain. Interestingly, the cancer mutation analyses show that the D412G mutation and R81T mutation, which compromises SIN1 T86 phosphorylation (8), are mutually exclusive with either AKT1 gene amplification or PIK3CA oncogenic mutations (9). Collectively, these observations support a notion that mutations in PI3K, AKT, and SIN1 affect a common pathway important for cancer development.
Finally, compared with SIN1-WT, introduction of SIN1D412G mutant into ovarian cancer cells that are depleted of endogenous SIN1 significantly increased AKT phosphorylation. These cells also show stronger oncogenic features, such as resistance to apoptosis-inducing and chemotherapeutic drugs, enhanced colony formation ability, and increased tumor growth in xenograft. Given that SIN1 phosphorylation is also compromised by a cancer patient–derived mutation, R81T, these findings provide important clues for SIN1 dysregulation in tumorigenesis. Further genetic and biochemical studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms and relevant contribution of SIN1 mutations in different cancer types.
In summary, SIN1 can regulate mTORC2 in multiple ways: (i) it facilitates mTORC2 complex formation (1–3); (ii) it is responsible for recruiting certain mTORC2 substrates, including AKT and SGK (10); (iii) its PH domain directly receives the PI3K signal to activate mTORC2 (9); and (iv) its PH domain recruits mTORC2 to plasma membrane (9). Notably, SIN1 regulates mTORC2 activity in both positive and negative manners. The switch between negative and positive is dictated by PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. Upon activation of PI3K, binding of the SIN1-PH domain by PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 not only relieves its inhibition on the mTOR kinase but also promotes mTORC2 translocation to plasma membrane for phosphorylation of its physiologic substrates. The current study together with previous results establishes SIN1 as a critical signaling integrator for mTORC2 activity.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
This work is supported by NIH grants GM51586 and CA196878 (to K.-L. Guan).
- ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.