Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Journal Sections
    • Subscriptions
    • Reviewing
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immuno-oncology
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
    • Journal Press Releases
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • 10th Anniversary
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Discovery
Cancer Discovery
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Journal Sections
    • Subscriptions
    • Reviewing
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immuno-oncology
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
    • Journal Press Releases
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • 10th Anniversary
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

PTEN Is a Major Tumor Suppressor in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Regulates an NF-κB–Cytokine Network

Haoqiang Ying, Kutlu G. Elpek, Anant Vinjamoori, Stephanie M. Zimmerman, Gerald C. Chu, Haiyan Yan, Eliot Fletcher-Sananikone, Hailei Zhang, Yingchun Liu, Wei Wang, Xiaojia Ren, Hongwu Zheng, Alec C. Kimmelman, Ji-hye Paik, Carol Lim, Samuel R. Perry, Shan Jiang, Brian Malinn, Alexei Protopopov, Simona Colla, Yonghong Xiao, Aram F. Hezel, Nabeel Bardeesy, Shannon J. Turley, Y. Alan Wang, Lynda Chin, Sarah P. Thayer and Ronald A. DePinho
Haoqiang Ying
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kutlu G. Elpek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anant Vinjamoori
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie M. Zimmerman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerald C. Chu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haiyan Yan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eliot Fletcher-Sananikone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hailei Zhang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yingchun Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaojia Ren
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongwu Zheng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alec C. Kimmelman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ji-hye Paik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol Lim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel R. Perry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shan Jiang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Malinn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexei Protopopov
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simona Colla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yonghong Xiao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aram F. Hezel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nabeel Bardeesy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannon J. Turley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Alan Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynda Chin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah P. Thayer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald A. DePinho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0031 Published July 2011
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Initiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is driven by oncogenic KRAS mutation, and disease progression is associated with frequent loss of tumor suppressors. In this study, human PDAC genome analyses revealed frequent deletion of the PTEN gene as well as loss of expression in primary tumor specimens. A potential role for PTEN as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor is further supported by mouse genetic studies. The mouse PDAC driven by oncogenic Kras mutation and Pten deficiency also sustains spontaneous extinction of Ink4a expression and shows prometastatic capacity. Unbiased transcriptomic analyses established that combined oncogenic Kras and Pten loss promotes marked NF-κB activation and its cytokine network, with accompanying robust stromal activation and immune cell infiltration with known tumor-promoting properties. Thus, PTEN/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway alteration is a common event in PDAC development and functions in part to strongly activate the NF-κB network, which may serve to shape the PDAC tumor microenvironment.

Significance: Detailed molecular genetics studies established that PTEN operates as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor to promote metastatic PDAC development. The strong activation of the NF-κB–cytokine program in Pten-deficient tumors provides additional avenues for targeted therapies in tumors with altered PI3K regulation. Cancer Discovery; 1(2); 158–69. ©2011 AACR.

Read the Commentary on this article by Chiao and Ling, p. 103

This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 91

Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with a dismal 5-year survival rate ranging between 3% and 5% (1). Clinically, >3% of PDAC patients present with advanced primary disease, often with metastases primarily to the liver and peritoneum (1). Pathologically, PDAC exhibits a predominantly ductal-like glandular pattern with varying degrees of differentiation that typically arise from precursor ductal lesions termed pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN; ref. 1). A hallmark pathologic feature of primary PDAC is desmoplasia characterized by the presence of an exuberant stroma consisting of fibroblasts and inflammatory cells (2). PDAC desmoplasia functions not only to promote tumor development (3) but also to impair cancer drug delivery by decreasing tumor vascular density and thereby contributing to poor therapeutic response (4). The pathways and mechanisms shaping the PDAC tumor microenvironment and immune cell infiltration during tumor genesis and progression are not well understood, although paracrine signals involving Tgfβ1 and Hh have been shown to mediate aspects of the protumorigenic communication between tumor cells and surrounding stroma (5, 6).

The key genetic alteration driving PDAC genesis is activating KRAS mutations, found in >90% of cases, and it occurs as an early genetic event driving PanIN formation (7, 8). Although activation of KRASG12D is the critical event driving PDAC genesis, its precise signaling surrogates and interactions with other signaling pathways remain an area of active investigation. In most tumor cell types, the classic signaling circuits emanating from activated KRASG12D include RAF-mitogen–activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), and Ral GDS pathways. However, in human PDAC, mounting genomic evidence has indicated the presence of additional mutations targeting components of the PI3K pathway, suggesting that KRASG12D activation of the PI3K pathway is under active repression. Alterations in the PI3K pathway include activating mutations in the catalytic PI3K subunit (PI3KCA), mutations in the regulatory PI3K subunit (PIK3R1/p85α), and amplification of the PI3K downstream effector (AKT2; refs. 9–11). Decreased PTEN expression and accompanying elevations in PI3K/AKT signaling have been observed in pancreatic tumor cell lines, although deletion or loss-of-function mutations targeting PTEN have not been detected with significant frequency in human PDAC (12) and is widely assumed to be a less relevant tumor suppressor in human PDAC. However, previous mouse studies showing that pancreatic deletion of Pten or expression of constitutive active Akt leads to expansion of central acinar cells, putative pancreatic progenitors, and formation of PDAC in a small percentage of mice (13, 14), supporting the view that PTEN serves as a major tumor suppressor in murine, and possibly human, PDAC development.

In this study, using genetically engineered mouse models, we documented strong cooperative interactions of KrasG12D and Pten loss in promoting metastatic PDAC. Furthermore, molecular analysis indicated that Pten-deficient tumors exhibit classic PDAC genetic lesions as well as robust activation of NF-κB and its downstream cytokine pathway, which is associated with inflammatory responses in the tumor microenvironment.

Results

The frequent genomic alterations of PI3K pathway components in diverse tumor types prompted analysis of PTEN and AKT status in human PDAC. Tissue microarray (TMA) analysis of PTEN protein and measurement of AKT phosphorylation at S473 were performed in a collection of 54 human PDAC samples (Fig. 1A). Relative to surrounding stroma, we observed low or no PTEN expression in 70% of PDAC samples (38 of 54; Fig. 1Ai and ii), findings consistent with previous reports of absent PTEN expression in human PDAC (12, 15). Analysis of phospho-AKT revealed moderate to high AKT phosphorylation in 68.5% of samples (37 of 54), with most tumors exhibiting moderate levels of AKT activation (30 of 54; Fig. 1Ai). Statistical analysis revealed significant negative correlation between PTEN expression and AKT phosphorylation (P = 0.02, Fisher exact test; P = 0.03, χ2 test; Fig. 1A). Correspondingly, high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis of 61 samples of epithelial-enriched primary tumor cells or primary xenografts from PDAC patient samples showed deletion of 1 or 2 copies of the PTEN locus in 9 of 61 (15%) of tumor samples (Fig. 1B). PTEN deletion events were typically associated with large regions of 10q chromosome loss, occasionally the whole chromosome arm—a pattern similar to that in other tumor types (16). In addition, the AKT2 locus was subject to gain/amplification in 12 of 61 (20%) samples (Fig. 1B), in line with a previous report (11). Although only 1 sample harbored both genetic events, PTEN deletion or AKT2 gain/amplification occurred in 32.8% of PDAC samples (20 of 61; Fig.1B). Together, these observations implicate aberrant activation of the PI3K pathway by either PTEN loss or AKT2 activation in a significant subset of human PDACs.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

PTEN is deleted/downregulated in human pancreatic cancer, and Pten inactivation cooperates with KrasG12D to induce PDAC. A, representative IHC images of PTEN and pAKT staining from the TMA analysis showing samples with low or no PTEN staining and moderate to high pAKT (i, ii) or high PTEN staining and low pAKT (iii). Statistical analysis of the TMA data is shown in the bottom panel. pAKT, phospho-AKT. B, aCGH heat map detailing patterns of PTEN deletion and AKT2 gain/amplification in primary PDAC tumor specimens. Regions of amplification and deletion are denoted in red and blue, respectively. The arrowhead indicates the sample with concomitant PTEN deletion and AKT2 amplification. C, Kaplan–Meier overall survival analysis for mice of indicated genotypes. Cohort size for each genotype is indicated. D, typical ductal adenocarcinoma observed in a Pdx1-Cre LSL-KrasG12D PtenL/+ animal showing well-differentiated glandular tumor cells (i) that are positive for the ductal marker, cytokeratin-19 (ii), and are negative for the acinar marker, amylase (iii), and the endocrine marker, insulin (iv). CK19, cytokeratin-19. Scale bars, 100 μm.

Although PI3K is regarded as a major surrogate of KRAS signaling, Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PanINs showed a notable lack of robust Akt activation (Supplementary Fig. S2Aiii). The above genomic data prompted us to hypothesize that PTEN may be actively suppressing the activation of the PI3K pathway in KrasG12D-driven lesions. To test this hypothesis, we examined the cooperative interaction of activated KrasG12D and Pten loss, using mice engineered with LSL-KrasG12D, PtenL, and pancreatic-specific Pdx1-Cre alleles (17–19). In contrast to Pdx1-Cre LSL-KrasG12D mice, the Pdx1-Cre LSL-KrasG12D PtenL/+ mice (n = 40) presented with highly invasive pancreatic tumors and a median survival of 17 weeks (Fig. 1C). End-stage histopathologic analysis revealed most mice (28 of 40) with adenocarcinoma exhibiting well-differentiated to moderately differentiated glandular structures that were CK19 positive and devoid of acinar (amylase) or endocrine (insulin) markers (Fig. 1D). These morphologic features are typical of human PDAC (20). In contrast, all 11 Pdx1-Cre LSL-KrasG12D PtenL/L mice presented with rapidly progressive acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) and PanIN formation and exuberant stromal reaction throughout the pancreas, with occasional invasive cancers (Supplementary Fig. S1A). None of these mice survived beyond 3 weeks, presumably as a result of severe pancreatic insufficiency. Consistent with a previous report (14), Pdx1-Cre PtenL/L mice progressively develop ADM, whereas the Pten-heterozygous pancreas is morphologically normal (Supplementary Fig. S1B).

To examine the impact of single-copy Pten loss on evolving pancreatic tumors in the KrasG12D model, we conducted a detailed serial comparative analysis of Pdx1-Cre LSL-KrasG12D and Pdx1-Cre LSL-KrasG12D PtenL/+ littermates at 4, 6, 8, and 10 weeks of age. Relative to the Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D model, the phenotype of the Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ pancreas was far more aggressive, with significant increase in the number and size of ADM and PanIN lesions (n = 5; Supplementary Fig. S2B and C), more profound stromal reaction (Supplementary Fig. S2Ai and v), increased epithelial proliferation (Supplementary Fig. S2Aiv and viii), and moderately elevated Akt phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. S2Aiii and vii). The lesions of both genotypes exhibited similarly strong ERK (MAPK1) activation (Supplementary Fig. S2Aii and vi). Together, these data suggest that, in the context of KrasG12D-initiated pancreatic neoplasms, Pten can repress PI3K signaling and constrain malignant progression in vivo.

One prominent and consistent feature of Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ ductal lesions was a pronounced stromal reaction with inflammatory cell infiltration comparable to that in human PDAC (1). When compared with Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D littermates, 6-week-old Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ animals already exhibited more exuberant reactive stroma surrounding the metaplasia and PanIN lesions that was highly enriched with smooth muscle actin (SMA)–positive pancreatic stellate cells and S100A4-positive fibroblasts (Fig. 2Ai–iii and vi–viii). In addition, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ pancreata showed dramatically increased CD45+ leukocyte infiltration compared with that in wild-type or Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D pancreata (Supplementary Fig. S3). Specifically, in the Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ pancreata, CD11b+Gr-1+ myeloid cells accounted for the majority of the inflammatory cell infiltration, especially Gr-1–low myeloid-derived suppressor cells (Fig. 2B), and significant increases in CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) were also documented (Fig. 2B). These FACS results aligned with immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis showing obvious myeloid and Treg infiltration surrounding metaplastic and PanIN lesions in Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ specimens (Fig. 2Aiv, v, ix, and x).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Pten deficiency induces strong stromal reaction with immune cell infiltration and promotes the development of invasive and metastatic pancreatic tumors in cooperation with KrasG12D. A, six-week-old pancreata from KrasG12D (i–v) and KrasG12D PtenL/+ (vi–x) stained with H&E (i, vi), or with antibodies to SMA (ii, vii), S100A4 (iii, viii), Gr-1 (iv, ix), and FoxP3 (v, x). B, left, analysis of myeloid cells. Bar graph showing percentage of CD45+CD11b+Gr-1low (white) and Gr-1high (black) cells in total live cells of wild-type (n = 3), KrasG12D (n = 3), and KrasG12D PtenL/+ (n = 3) pancreata. Right, Treg analysis. Percentage of CD25+FoxP3+ cells within CD4+ T cells in pancreas of wild-type (n = 2), KrasG12D (n = 2) and KrasG12D PtenL/+ (n = 2) mice. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. C, tumor invasion and metastases. Gross picture shows liver metastases (i). H&E staining shows local invasion into duodenum wall (ii), lymph node metastasis (iii), liver metastasis (iv), and microscopic lung metastasis (vi). Liver metastasis is stained with cytokeratin-19 antibody (v). Scale bars, 100 μm.

Pdx1-Cre LSL-KrasG12D PtenL/+ tumors also showed extensive invasion of adjacent organs (Fig. 2C). Invasion and metastases into the lymphatic system were also frequently detected (Fig. 2Ciii), and multifocal CK19-positive macro- or micrometastases to liver were observed in 12 of 35 (34%) of tumor-bearing animals with lesions resembling primary tumors (Fig. 2Civ and v). In contrast, microscopic lung metastasis was rare (1 of 35; Fig. 2Cvi). Overall, the distribution pattern of liver and regional lymph node metastases is similar to that observed in the human disease (1).

Given the capacity of PTEN to operate as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor in other settings (21–23), we next examined the status of the remaining wild-type allele of Pten in the Pdx1-Cre LSL-KrasG12D PtenL/+ tumors. Early-passage cell lines derived from the murine PDACs were used to avoid the presence of contaminating normal cells. Allele-specific PCR genotyping revealed that 3 of 5 tumors retained the wild-type Pten allele as well as Pten protein expression (Fig. 3A and B; Supplementary Fig. S4A), and sequence analysis of the reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)–generated open reading frame (ORF) revealed wild-type Pten sequences (Supplementary Table S1).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Molecular analysis of KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDACs. A, PCR analysis of the Pten locus in genomic DNA from primary murine PDAC cell lines (lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10) and control tail DNA from the same animal (lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9). Although all control tail DNA showed both wild-type (Pten+) and Pten lox (PtenL) alleles (lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9), and deleted Pten (PtenD) allele was present in all tumor DNA (lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10), 3 tumor lines maintain the wild-type Pten allele (lanes 4, 6, and 8). B, Pten IHC staining in tumors with Pten LOH (top) or wild-type Pten allele (bottom) Scale bar, 100 μm. C, Western blot analysis for p16Ink4a, p19Arf, and Smad4 expression in early-passage KrasG12D (lanes 1–3) or KrasG12D PtenL/+ (lanes 4–7) PDEC lines and KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDAC lines (lanes 8–12). PDAC line from KrasG12D p53L/+ was used as a control (lane 13). D, KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDAC cell lines were treated with doxorubicin 0.4 μg/mL for 16 hours and collected for Western blot analysis for p53 and p21. KrasG12D p53L/+ tumor line was used as a negative control (lanes 11 and 12).

Beyond PTEN analysis, we also audited the status of other key PDAC tumor suppressor genes: Ink4a/Arf, p53, and Smad4. Analysis of the Ink4a/Arf locus revealed loss of p16Ink4a and p19Arf expression in all Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDAC cells derived from end-stage tumors between 11 and 24 weeks of age (n = 5) relative to expression in premalignant pancreatic ductal epithelial cells (PDEC) derived from 6-week-old Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ or Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D mice (Fig. 3C). The loss of p16Ink4a expression resulted from gene deletion (1 of 5; Supplementary Fig. S4B, lane 2) or methylation-associated epigenetic silencing (4 of 5) of the p16Ink4a promoter region (Supplementary Fig. S4B, lanes 1, 3–5). Examination of the p53 tumor suppressor revealed physical and functional integrity, as evidenced by strong induction of p53 and its downstream target p21CIP1 upon doxorubicin treatment of 5 Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ tumor cell cultures (Fig. 3D). All 5 samples tested retained Smad4 expression, and sequence analysis of RT-PCR–generated Smad4 ORF confirmed the wild-type Smad4 status (Fig. 3C; Supplementary Table S1). Thus, in this model, Pten can function as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor and extinction of Ink4a/Arf remains a critical cooperative event, as classically observed in the human disease (2).

To understand the molecular basis of how oncogenic KrasG12D and Pten deficiency might cooperate to promote the aforementioned tumor biological features, we performed an unbiased transcriptomic profiling of Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PDECs versus Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs derived from respective 6-week-old animals. We used primary PDECs, as opposed to tumor cells, to better discern the proximal molecular actions of KrasG12D and Pten loss on premalignant epithelium. The differentially expressed genes (215 genes; fold change ≥1.3; P < 0.05) were further analyzed for enrichment of specific binding elements to discern key regulators driving these changes, as reported previously (18). These in silico promoter analyses showed significant enrichment of NF-κB binding elements (Supplementary Table S2, P = 0.03). The observations gain added support in light of NF-κB induction by an activated PI3K/AKT pathway (24, 25). Accordingly, Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs exhibited increased nuclear accumulation of NF-κB transcription factor subunit p65 (also known as RelA; Fig. 4A) and higher NF-κB transactivation activity (Fig. 4B) relative to Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D controls. In addition, IHC analysis confirmed markedly elevated levels of phosphorylated nuclear NF-κB in Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PanINs relative to those morphologically similar lesions in Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D tissue (Fig. 4C), suggesting that activation of NF-κB is not likely the consequence of a difference in lesion size between the 2 genotypes. Of interest, although Pdx-Cre PtenL/L mice develop progressive ADM, no significant nuclear accumulation of NF-κB was observed in the ductal lesions (Supplementary Fig. S5), indicating that both Kras mutation and Pten deficiency are required for activation of the NF-κB pathway.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Pten deficiency activates the NF-κB pathway. A, cytoplasmic (C) or nuclear (N) extract was prepared from KrasG12D (lanes 1–4) or KrasG12D PtenL/+ (lanes 5–12) PDECs and blotted for NF-κB p65. Lamin A/C and caspase 3 were used as markers for nuclear and cytoplasmic fraction, respectively. KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs were also treated with either vehicle (Ctr) or LY, 20 μM, for 24 hours before collection. B, KrasG12D or KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs were transfected with NF-κB–luciferase reporter, and KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs were treated with either vehicle (Ctr) or LY, 20 μM, for 24 hours before being collected for luciferase activity assay. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. C, six-week-old pancreata from KrasG12D (top) and KrasG12D PtenL/+ (bottom) mice were stained with phospho–NF-κB p65 (pRelA) Scale bars, 100 μm. D. KrasG12D PDECs were infected with pSuper (Ctr) or pSuper-shPten (shPten) and blotted for Pten, pAkt, and Akt (lanes 1–4). Cytoplasmic (C) or nuclear (N) extract was blotted for NF-κB p65 (lanes 5–12).

On the functional level, treatment of Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs with a PI3K inhibitor, LY294002 (LY), attenuated nuclear RelA levels and NF-κB transactivation activity (Fig. 4A and B); conversely, short hairpin RNA (shRNA)–mediated knockdown of Pten in KrasG12D PDECs induced Akt phosphorylation and NF-κB nuclear accumulation (Fig. 4D), indicating that NF-κB activation is PI3K dependent. The IKK pathway plays essential roles during NF-κB activation (26). However, no obvious induction of IKKα/β activity was observed in Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs compared with Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D cells, and LY treatment exerted no inhibitory effect on IKKα/β activation as well as downstream IκBα phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. S6). Therefore, our data support the idea that PI3K-mediated NF-κB nuclear accumulation and activation are likely IKK independent (24, 25, 27). Finally, tumors from Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ mice also showed strong nuclear phospho-RelA signal (Fig. 5A). To address the functional relevance of NF-κB activation in these established PDAC tumor cells, we assess tumorigenic activity following introduction of a well-known nonphosphorylatable, dominant-negative mutant of IκBα (IκBαM; ref. 28). As shown in Fig. 5B, IκBαM inhibited clonogenic activity of Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDAC lines in vitro, indicating cell-autonomous function of NF-κB activation. In addition, suppression of NF-κB also dramatically attenuated tumor xenograft growth in vivo (Fig. 5C and D). Together, these data support the view that NF-κB activation plays an important contributory role in the cooperative actions of KrasG12D activation and Pten deficiency in PDAC development.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Suppression of NF-κB inhibits tumorigenic activity. A, PDAC from KrasG12D PtenL/+ animals was stained for phospho–NF-κB p65 (pRelA) Scale bar, 100 μm. B, colony formation assay for KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDAC cell lines infected with pBabe (Vec) or pBabe-IκBαM. Quantification of colony numbers was shown on the right. C, KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDAC cell lines were infected with pBabe (Vec) or pBabe-IκBαM and injected s.c. into nude mice with Vec in the left flank and IκBαM in the right flank, respectively. Tumor volumes were measured in D. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

Consistent with NF-κB control of cytokine and chemokine expression in numerous cell types, including epithelial cells (29), multiple cytokines and chemokines—including IL-6, IL-23, Cxcl1, Ccl20, and Csf3—were found to be significantly upregulated in Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs and pancreata relative to controls (Fig. 6A, Supplementary Fig. S7A). Moreover, IκBα mutant expression decreased nuclear NF-κB p65 levels and abolished cytokine and chemokine expression in the Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs (Fig. 6B, Supplementary Fig. S7B). Consistent with PI3K-directed activation of the NF-κB pathway, the PI3K inhibitor LY decreased cytokine and chemokine levels in Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs (Fig. 6C). Conversely, shRNA-mediated Pten knockdown increased cytokine and chemokine levels in Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PDECs (Fig. 6D).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Pten deficiency induces cytokine expression. A, expression of indicated cytokines and chemokines was measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in KrasG12D (n = 3) or KrasG12D PtenL/+ (n = 5) PDECs. B, expression of indicated cytokines and chemokines was measured by qPCR in KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs infected with pBabe (Vec) or pBabe-IκBαM. C, expression of indicated cytokines and chemokines was measured by qPCR in KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs treated with vehicle (Ctr) or LY-LY, 20 μM, for 24 hours. D, expression of indicated cytokines and chemokines was measured by qPCR in KrasG12D PDECs infected with pSuper (Ctr) or pSuper-shPten (shPten). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

These murine observations prompted analysis of the relationship of PTEN status and cytokine and chemokine expression to human PDAC. To that end, we analyzed publically available expression profiles (30) in Oncomine and documented that 4 of the 5 cytokines (CCL20, CXCL1, IL-6, and IL-23) showed significant upregulation in human PDAC compared with normal pancreas and that PTEN expression was significantly downregulated in tumor samples (Supplementary Fig. S8). Notably, with the exception of CSF3, the upregulated expression of the 4 cytokines showed strong negative correlation with PTEN level (Supplementary Fig. S8). These studies suggest that functional genetic interactions between PTEN and the NF-κB–cytokine network appear operative in both mouse and human PDAC, although we acknowledge that multiple genetic mechanisms beyond NF-κB may regulate cytokine expression in human PDAC.

Discussion

In this study, high-resolution analysis of human PDAC genomes has uncovered frequent loss of at least 1 copy of the PTEN gene. In mouse genetic studies, combined genomic, genetic, and functional studies establish a key role for the Pten tumor suppressor in the progression of Kras-initiated PDAC development in the mouse. Although recent studies have shown Kras and Pten cooperation in the development of mouse PDAC (31), our study is distinguished in showing that Pten can function as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor, aligning well with human genomic profiles, as evidenced by retention of Pten heterozygosity in the majority of mouse tumors. Further characterization also established frequent liver metastases. In both mouse and human PDAC, genome scale analysis and confirmatory biochemical studies reveal that PI3K/Pten-dependent NF-κB pathway activation. NF-κB activation was associated with induction of various cytokines and chemokines, which may contribute to the prominent inflammatory cell infiltrates in the Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ tumors. In addition, suppression of the NF-κB pathway inhibited Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ tumor growth in vivo, indicating an important role in tumor maintenance and hence a potential therapeutic target in tumors with altered PI3K regulation.

The lack of Akt activation in KrasG12D PanIN and metaplastic lesions implied active suppression of the PI3K signaling axis. The activity of the PI3K pathway is constantly regulated on many levels involving multiple nodes in feedback loops. This circuitry is in part reflected by coexisting alterations targeting multiple PI3K pathway components in the course of tumor progression, such as the occurrence of KRAS and PTEN mutations in colorectal cancers (32). These observations may align with a recent report that p85α, the regulatory subunit of PI3K, directly interacts with PTEN and enhances its phosphatase activity (33). In this context, it is possible that p85α induction of Pten activity in the presence of mutant Kras keeps PI3K signaling in check and that disruption of such regulation by genetic loss ot reduction of Pten enables KrasG12D to drive malignant progression of PDAC. Similarly, “reinforcing” events in PDAC, such as mutations of p85α or PIK3CA or amplification of AKT2, would be expected to disrupt negative regulation to ensure the full activation of PI3K signaling in tumorigenesis. The genetic and biological observations of our study justify the need for a more comprehensive mutational analysis of these components in a large human PDAC sample set and assessment of these profiles with modulation of PI3K signaling and NF-κB network activation.

The NF-κB pathway is constitutively active across many different types of tumors, including pancreatic cancer (2, 34). NF-κB activation in RAS-transformed cells is mediated through both MAPK and PI3K pathways (35). In agreement, our data showed that Pten deficiency cooperates with KrasG12D to induce NF-κB activity through the PI3K pathway. Similarly, NF-κB activity is found to be sustained by an elevated PI3K/Akt pathway in several human PDAC cell lines and is important for the viability of the tumor cells (12). Of interest, PTEN expression itself is suppressed by the NF-κB pathway (36). Therefore, PI3K activation via Pten loss and NF-κB may form a powerful positive feedback loop downstream of oncogenic Kras during PDAC development. It was recently shown that loss of p53 also cooperates with KrasG12D to activate the NF-κB pathway in lung adenocarcinoma (37), suggesting that additional mechanisms may contribute to NF-κB activation in tumors driven by oncogenic Kras. Our data that p53 remains intact in Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ tumor cells and p19Arf expression is maintained in premalignant ductal cells (Fig. 3C and D) suggest that the p53 axis is not prominently involved in activation of the NF-κB pathway in Pten-deficient PDECs. At the same time, p53 inactivation through loss of p19Arf expression in PDAC cells may further contribute to NF-κB activation in more advanced invasive tumors.

Many in vivo studies have established a central role of NF-κB during tumor development (38). Selective inactivation of IKKβ in either intestinal epithelial cells or myeloid cells suppressed tumor formation in inflammation-induced colorectal carcinoma model, indicating that the NF-κB pathway functions in both a cell-autonomous and non–cell-autonomous fashion (39). Suppression of NF-κB by a dominant-negative IκBα mutant inhibits the tumorigenic activity of Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDAC cells and suggests that the NF-κB pathway may function in a cell-autonomous way in established tumors. Meanwhile, our data showing that the NF-κB pathway is activated in Pdx1-Cre KrasG12D PtenL/+ PDECs to induce various cytokines and chemokines reveal that NF-κB may also function through paracrine mechanisms during PDAC development to modulate the interaction between tumor cells and its microenvironment, a supposition that will require further study in a defined genetic model.

As an anatomic and functional component of cancer, the composition of the tumor microenvironment shows many characteristics observed in chronic inflammation (40). A recent animal study has indicated that induction of chronic pancreatitis dramatically accelerated KrasG12V-induced pancreatic cancer formation, pointing to the importance of a permissive environment during Kras-mediated PDAC development (41). However, the underlying mechanisms that orchestrate cooperation between tumor cells and their inflammatory milieu are less understood. In this article, we provided additional evidence that the PTEN/PI3K pathway may cooperate with endogenous KrasG12D to induce the expression of various cytokines and chemokines in premalignant epithelial cells in NF-κB–dependent manner. Among the induced cytokines, IL-23 and Ccl20 were particularly noteworthy, given their well-established roles as chemoattractants for lymphocyte subsets, including Tregs (42, 43); furthermore, Cxcl1 and Csf3 are integral in the chemotaxis of granulocytes and macrophages to promote tumor progression (44). Such cytokine induction in KrasG12D PtenL/+ ductal epithelial cells supported the hypothesis that PI3K activation in combination with oncogenic Kras in the epithelial compartment may facilitate the recruitment of various protumor cell types within tumor stroma. Not only may the highly enriched cytokines and chemokines in the tumor microenvironment suppress antitumor immunity, but also the infiltrating inflammatory cells, as well as other stromal cells, produce various growth factors to further amplify the PI3K pathway output in Pten-deficient cells and support tumor growth. An inbred PDAC model will be critical to further clarify such tumor microenvironment communication.

Tumors harboring oncogenic Kras mutations are often associated with therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis, and mutant Kras is, until now, still regarded as an “undruggable” target (45). Notably, using a Kras mutant animal lung cancer model, a recent in vivo study showed that the combination of a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor and a MAP/ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitor induced drastic tumor shrinkage, indicating that targeting Kras surrogates is a feasible therapeutic strategy (46). The strong cooperation between Pten deficiency and oncogenic Kras during PDAC development, along with activation of the NF-κB pathway within such a context, further endorses clinical trials for combined therapies with MEK inhibitors and PI3K or NF-κB inhibitors. Alternatively, directly targeting the cytokine networks may diminish immune sequestration in PDAC and enhance immunotherapeutic strategies.

Methods

Primary Tumors, Tumor Cell Enrichment, and aCGH Profiling

TMA samples of human PDAC were obtained from Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Pathology tumor bank (Boston, Massachusetts). For aCGH profiling, fresh-frozen specimens of primary PDAC were obtained from Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Pancreatic Research tumor bank (Boston, Massachusetts). To overcome 2 problems typical for biorepositories—namely, low tumor cellularity and insufficient size of a specimen to perform genomics studies—the following 2-step protocol has been developed. First, samples were enriched for epithelial content, using EpCAM-coated Dynabeads (Invitrogen). About 10-mm2 chunks of frozen tissue embedded with OCT were disintegrated by Medimachine (BD Biosciences) using 50-μm Medicon (BD Biosciences) and syringe-type 50-μm Filcon (BD Biosciences) in the buffer containing PBS, 1% fetal calf serum, 0.8% sodium citrate, and 10 mM EGTA. Bead bounding and cell isolation were performed according to the Dynabeads Epithelial Enrich protocol (Invitrogen). The purity of the enriched epithelial cells was >80%. The yield of epithelial cells from frozen tissue corresponded to approximately 40% of the yield from fresh tissue according to our pilot experiments (A. Protopopov, unpublished observations). Immediately after the enrichment, cells were subjected to DNA isolation using QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen). Next, DNA was treated according to GenomePlex whole-genome amplification technology (Sigma-Aldrich). aCGH profiling was performed as described (11, 47) on the Agilent Human CGH 244K platform, with the following modification: 2 μg of whole-genome amplification product per hybridization was labeled chemically.

Mice

Pdx1-Cre, KrasG12D and PtenL mice have been described previously (17–19). Mice were interbred and maintained on an FvB/C57Bl6 hybrid background in pathogen-free conditions at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, Massachusetts). Mice were injected i.p. with BrdU at 60 mg/kg every 12 hours for 48 hours before necropsy. All manipulations were performed with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approval.

Xenograft Studies

For xenografts, 1 × 106 cells suspended in 100 μL of Hanks buffered saline solution were injected s.c. into the lower flank of NCr nude mice (Taconic). Tumor volumes were measured every 3 days, starting from day 4 postinjection. All xenograft experiments were approved by the IACUC.

IHC and Western Blot Analysis

Tissues were fixed in 10% formalin overnight and embedded in paraffin. IHC analysis was performed as described (48). The visualization of primary antibodies was accomplished with the horseradish peroxidase system (Vectastain ABC Kit; Vector). The primary antibodies used for IHC were as follows: cytokeratin 19 (TROMA-III; DSHB), amylase (A8273; Sigma-Aldrich), insulin (A0564; Dako), SMA (NB600-531; Novus), Gr-1 (550291; BD Biosciences), FoxP3 (ab54501; Abcam), phospho-RelA (3037; Cell Signaling), phospho-ERK (4376; Cell Signaling), BrdU (ab1293; Abcam), Pten (9559; Cell Signaling), Phospho-AktSer473 (3787; Cell Signaling). Images were captured using a Leica DM1400B microsystem and Leica FW4000 version 1.2.1. The primary antibodies used for Western blot were as follows: actin (sc-1615; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p16Ink4a (sc-1207; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Smad4 (sc-7966; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p19Arf (ab80; Abcam), p21Cip (556431; BD Biosciences), p53 (VP-P956; Vector), NF-κB p65 (ab7970; Abcam), lamin A/C (2032; Cell Signaling), caspase 3 (9665; Cell Signaling), IKKα (2682; Cell Signaling), IKKβ (2678; Cell Signaling), phospho-IKKα/β (2697; Cell Signaling), IκBα (sc-371; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and phospho-IκBα (2859; Cell Signaling).

FACS Analysis of Inflammatory Cell Infiltration

Pancreata from mice were harvested and gently disrupted by forceps teasing and then incubated in digestion buffer containing RPMI 1640, 0.2 mg/mL collagenase P (Roche), 0.1 mg/mL DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich), and 0.8 mg/mL dispase (Invitrogen) for 45 minutes at 37°C. Single-cell suspensions were subjected to RBC lysis using ACK buffer (Lonza Biowhittaker) and transferred into FACS buffer (PBS, 2 mM EDTA, and 2% FBS) containing FcR-blocking (2.4G2) antibody. Cells were stained with fluorescently labeled monoclonal antibodies specific for CD45 (30-F11), CD4 (RM4-5), CD11b (M1/70), CD25 (PC61), Gr-1 (RB6-8C5), or isotype controls. For analysis of Tregs, cells were stained with anti-CD45, -CD4, and -CD25 antibodies, and intracellularly stained with anti–FoxP3-FITC (eBioscience). Cells were analyzed using a FACSAria (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo Software (TreeStar).

Establishment of Primary PDEC and PDAC Lines

Primary PDECs were established as noted (49). Briefly, the pancreata from 6-week-old mice were digested at 37°C with 1 mg/mL Collagenase V solution (Sigma-Aldrich) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS with agitation for 20 minutes. The digested material was filtered through a 100-μm nylon cell strainer. Fragments trapped on the mesh were further digested with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA for 5 minutes. The ductal fragments were plated on collagen I–coated plates (BD Biosciences) and maintained in DMEM: Ham's F 12 medium supplemented with 5 mg/mL D-glucose (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1 mg/mL soybean trypsin inhibitor type I (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 mL/L insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS+; BD Biosciences), 25 μg/mL bovine pituitary extract (Invitrogen), 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 nM 3,3′,5-triiodo-L-thyronine (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 μM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 ng/mL cholera toxin (Sigma-Aldrich), 1.22 mg/mL nicotinamide (Sigma-Aldrich), and 5% Nu-serum IV culture supplement (BD Biosciences). All studies were performed on cells cultivated for <8 passages. Primary PDAC lines were established as described (48).

Molecular Analysis

DNA and RNA isolation was performed as described. cDNA was reverse transcribed from RNA, using SuperScript II (Invitrogen). PCR primers were designed to amplify the full-length ORF of Pten and Smad4, and PCR products were subjected to direct sequencing.

For Pten cDNA sequencing, the primers were as follows:

  • Pten-F, 5′-ATGACAGCCATCATCAAAGAGATCGTTAG-3′;

  • Pten-R, 5′-GGGTCAGACTTTTGTAATTTGTGAATGCTG-3′;

  • Pten-F1, 5′-GACGGACTGGTGTAATGATTTGTGC-3′;

  • Pten-F2, 5′-GGTAAATACGTTCTTCATACCAGGACC-3′; and

  • Pten-R1, 5′-GTCTCTGGTCCTTACTTCCCCAT-3′.

For Smad4 cDNA sequencing, the primers were as follows:

  • Smad4-F, 5′-CCGATGGACAATATGTCTATAACAAATACACC-3′;

  • Smad4-R, 5′-TCAGTCTAAAGGCTGTGGGTCCGCAATG-3′;

  • Smad4-F1, 5′-GAGCGGGTTGTCTCACCTGGAATTG-3′;

  • Smad4-F2, 5′-GAAGGTGACGTTTGGGTCAGGTG-3′;

  • Smad4-R1, 5′-CTCATCCTTCACTAACATACTTGGAGC-3′; and

  • Smad4-R2, 5′-CCAGGTAGTAACTCTGTACAAAGACC-3′.

Methylation-specific PCR analysis was performed as noted before (50). For DNA damage, cells were treated with doxorubicin at 0.4 μg/mL for 16 hours before being collected for Western blot analysis.

Clonogenic Assay

A total of 400 cells were seeded into each well of a 6-well plate in duplicate, and colonies were stained 7 days later with 0.2% crystal violet in 80% methanol.

Expression Profiling and Bioinformatics Analysis

mRNA expression profiling was performed at the Dana-Farber Microarray Core facility, using the Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Array (Affymetrix). A Student t test was used to identify differentially expressed genes according to expression profiles. Promoter analysis was performed as described (18). Complete profiles are deposited on the Gene Expression Omnibus website under superseries accession number GSE25828. Oncomine (Compendia Bioscience, Ann Arbor, MI) was used for analysis of the human PDAC expression profile. Gene expression correlation was calculated with a Pearson correlation analysis.

Statistical Analysis

Tumor-free survivals were analyzed using Graphpad Prism 4. The nonparametric Mann–Whitney test was used for statistical analyses. Significance of enrichment in the promoter analysis was computed based on Poisson distribution with Bonferroni correction. Correlation analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test and the χ2 test. Other comparisons were performed using the unpaired Student t test. For all experiments with error bars, the standard deviation was calculated to indicate the variation within each experiment and data; values represent mean ± SD.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support

Grant support derives from NIH Grants P50 CA127003-03 (DF/HCC SPORE in Gastrointestinal Cancer, H. Ying and R.A. DePinho), T32 CA009382-26 (H. Ying), P01 CA117969 (N. Bardeesy, S.P. Thayer, L. Chin, and R.A. DePinho). In addition, K.G. Elpek is supported by an AACR Centennial postdoctoral fellowship in cancer research; A.C. Kimmelman is supported by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, the Kimmel Scholar Award, and the AACR-PanCAN Career Development Award; and R.A. Depinho is supported by the Harvard Stem Cell Institute Cancer Program Pilot Grant and the Robert A. and Renee E. Belfer Foundation.

Acknowledgments

We thank David Tuveson and Tyler Jacks for the LSL-KrasG12D mice, Doug Melton for the Pdx1-Cre mice, and Shan Zhou for expert monitoring of the mouse colony.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Discovery Online (http://www.cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org).

  • Received February 21, 2011.
  • Revision received May 6, 2011.
  • Accepted May 10, 2011.
  • ©2011 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hidalgo M
    . Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1605–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hezel AF,
    2. Kimmelman AC,
    3. Stanger BZ,
    4. Bardeesy N,
    5. DePinho RA
    . Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev 2006;20:1218–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Erez N,
    2. Truitt M,
    3. Olson P,
    4. Arron ST,
    5. Hanahan D
    . Cancer-associated fibroblasts are activated in incipient neoplasia to orchestrate tumor-promoting inflammation in an NF-kappaB-dependent manner. Cancer Cell 2010;17:135–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Olive KP,
    2. Jacobetz MA,
    3. Davidson CJ,
    4. Gopinathan A,
    5. McIntyre D,
    6. Honess D,
    7. et al
    . Inhibition of hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 2009;324:1457–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bachem MG,
    2. Schunemann M,
    3. Ramadani M,
    4. Siech M,
    5. Beger H,
    6. Buck A,
    7. et al
    . Pancreatic carcinoma cells induce fibrosis by stimulating proliferation and matrix synthesis of stellate cells. Gastroenterology 2005;128:907–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Yauch RL,
    2. Gould SE,
    3. Scales SJ,
    4. Tang T,
    5. Tian H,
    6. Ahn CP,
    7. et al
    . A paracrine requirement for hedgehog signalling in cancer. Nature 2008;455:406–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Almoguera C,
    2. Shibata D,
    3. Forrester K,
    4. Martin J,
    5. Arnheim N,
    6. Perucho M
    . Most human carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas contain mutant c-K-ras genes. Cell 1988;53:549–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Moskaluk CA,
    2. Hruban RH,
    3. Kern SE
    . p16 and K-ras gene mutations in the intraductal precursors of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 1997;57:2140–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Jaiswal BS,
    2. Janakiraman V,
    3. Kljavin NM,
    4. Chaudhuri S,
    5. Stern HM,
    6. Wang W,
    7. et al
    . Somatic mutations in p85alpha promote tumorigenesis through class IA PI3K activation. Cancer Cell 2009;16:463–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Schonleben F,
    2. Qiu W,
    3. Ciau NT,
    4. Ho DJ,
    5. Li X,
    6. Allendorf JD,
    7. et al
    . PIK3CA mutations in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm/carcinoma of the pancreas. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3851–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Aguirre AJ,
    2. Brennan C,
    3. Bailey G,
    4. Sinha R,
    5. Feng B,
    6. Leo C,
    7. et al
    . High-resolution characterization of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:9067–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Asano T,
    2. Yao Y,
    3. Zhu J,
    4. Li D,
    5. Abbruzzese JL,
    6. Reddy SAG
    . The PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway is activated due to aberrant Pten expression and targets transcription factors NF-[kappa]B and c-Myc in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogene 2004;23:8571–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Elghazi L,
    2. Weiss AJ,
    3. Barker DJ,
    4. Callaghan J,
    5. Staloch L,
    6. Sandgren EP,
    7. et al
    . Regulation of pancreas plasticity and malignant transformation by Akt signaling. Gastroenterology 2009;136:1091–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Stanger BZ,
    2. Stiles B,
    3. Lauwers GY,
    4. Bardeesy N,
    5. Mendoza M,
    6. Wang Y,
    7. et al
    . Pten constrains centroacinar cell expansion and malignant transformation in the pancreas. Cancer Cell 2005;8:185–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Okami K,
    2. Wu L,
    3. Riggins G,
    4. Cairns P,
    5. Goggins M,
    6. Evron E,
    7. et al
    . Analysis of PTEN/MMAC1 alterations in aerodigestive tract tumors. Cancer Res 1998;58:509–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mertens F,
    2. Johansson B,
    3. Hoglund M,
    4. Mitelman F
    . Chromosomal imbalance maps of malignant solid tumors: a cytogenetic survey of 3185 neoplasms. Cancer Res 1997;57:2765–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Asher G,
    2. Lotem J,
    3. Sachs L,
    4. Kahana C,
    5. Shaul Y
    . Mdm-2 and ubiquitin-independent p53 proteasomal degradation regulated by NQO1. PNAS 2002;99:13125–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Zheng H,
    2. Ying H,
    3. Yan H,
    4. Kimmelman AC,
    5. Hiller DJ,
    6. Chen AJ,
    7. et al
    . p53 and Pten control neural and glioma stem/progenitor cell renewal and differentiation. Nature 2008;455:1129–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Jackson EL,
    2. Willis N,
    3. Mercer K,
    4. Bronson RT,
    5. Crowley D,
    6. Montoya R,
    7. et al
    . Analysis of lung tumor initiation and progression using conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras. Genes Dev 2001;15:3243–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Wilentz RE,
    2. Hruban RH
    . Pathology of cancer of the pancreas. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1998;7:43–65.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kwabi-Addo B,
    2. Giri D,
    3. Schmidt K,
    4. Podsypanina K,
    5. Parsons R,
    6. Greenberg N,
    7. et al
    . Haploinsufficiency of the Pten tumor suppressor gene promotes prostate cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:11563–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.
    1. Trotman LC,
    2. Niki M,
    3. Dotan ZA,
    4. Koutcher JA,
    5. Di Cristofano A,
    6. Xiao A,
    7. et al
    . Pten dose dictates cancer progression in the prostate. PLoS Biol 2003;1:E59.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Alimonti A,
    2. Carracedo A,
    3. Clohessy JG,
    4. Trotman LC,
    5. Nardella C,
    6. Egia A,
    7. et al
    . Subtle variations in Pten dose determine cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet 2010;42:454–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Madrid LV,
    2. Wang CY,
    3. Guttridge DC,
    4. Schottelius AJ,
    5. Baldwin AS Jr,
    6. Mayo MW
    . Akt suppresses apoptosis by stimulating the transactivation potential of the RelA/p65 subunit of NF-kappaB. Mol Cell Biol 2000;20:1626–38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Sizemore N,
    2. Leung S,
    3. Stark GR
    . Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in response to interleukin-1 leads to phosphorylation and activation of the NF-kappaB p65/RelA subunit. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:4798–805.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. DiDonato JA,
    2. Hayakawa M,
    3. Rothwarf DM,
    4. Zandi E,
    5. Karin M
    . A cytokine-responsive IkappaB kinase that activates the transcription factor NF-kappaB. Nature 1997;388:548–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Delhase M,
    2. Li N,
    3. Karin M
    . Kinase regulation in inflammatory response. Nature 2000;406:367–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Antwerp DJV,
    2. Martin SJ,
    3. Kafri T,
    4. Green DR,
    5. Verma IM
    . Suppression of TNF-α-Induced apoptosis by NF-κB. Science 1996;274:787–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Swamy M,
    2. Jamora C,
    3. Havran W,
    4. Hayday A
    . Epithelial decision makers: in search of the “epimmunome.” Nat Immunol 2010;11:656–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Badea L,
    2. Herlea V,
    3. Dima SO,
    4. Dumitrascu T,
    5. Popescu I
    . Combined gene expression analysis of whole-tissue and microdissected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma identifies genes specifically overexpressed in tumor epithelia. Hepatogastroenterology 2008;55:2016–27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Hill R,
    2. Calvopina JH,
    3. Kim C,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Dawson DW,
    6. Donahue TR,
    7. et al
    . PTEN Loss accelerates KrasG12D-induced pancreatic cancer development. Cancer Res 2010;70:7114–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Yuan TL,
    2. Cantley LC
    . PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: variations on a theme. Oncogene 2008;27:5497–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Chagpar RB,
    2. Links PH,
    3. Pastor MC,
    4. Furber LA,
    5. Hawrysh AD,
    6. Chamberlain MD,
    7. et al
    . Direct positive regulation of PTEN by the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:5471–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Aggarwal BB
    . Nuclear factor-kappaB: the enemy within. Cancer Cell 2004;6:203–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Arsura M,
    2. Mercurio F,
    3. Oliver AL,
    4. Thorgeirsson SS,
    5. Sonenshein GE
    . Role of the Ikappa B kinase complex in oncogenic Ras- and Raf-mediated transformation of rat liver epithelial cells. Mol Cell Biol 2000;20:5381–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Vasudevan KM,
    2. Gurumurthy S,
    3. Rangnekar VM
    . Suppression of PTEN expression by NF-{kappa}B prevents apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:1007–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Meylan E,
    2. Dooley AL,
    3. Feldser DM,
    4. Shen L,
    5. Turk E,
    6. Ouyang C,
    7. et al
    . Requirement for NF-kappaB signalling in a mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 2009;462:104–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Karin M
    . Nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer development and progression. Nature 2006;441:431–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Greten FR,
    2. Eckmann L,
    3. Greten TF,
    4. Park JM,
    5. Li ZW,
    6. Egan LJ,
    7. et al
    . IKKbeta links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer. Cell 2004;118:285–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Flier JS,
    2. Underhill LH,
    3. Dvorak HF
    . Tumors: wounds that do not heal. N Engl J Med 1986;315:1650–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Guerra C,
    2. Schuhmacher AJ,
    3. Canamero M,
    4. Grippo PJ,
    5. Verdaguer L,
    6. Perez-Gallego L,
    7. et al
    . Chronic pancreatitis is essential for induction of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by K-Ras oncogenes in adult mice. Cancer Cell 2007;11:291–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Kortylewski M,
    2. Xin H,
    3. Kujawski M,
    4. Lee H,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Harris T,
    7. et al
    . Regulation of the IL-23 and IL-12 balance by Stat3 signaling in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 2009;15:114–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Yamazaki T,
    2. Yang XO,
    3. Chung Y,
    4. Fukunaga A,
    5. Nurieva R,
    6. Pappu B,
    7. et al
    . CCR6 regulates the migration of inflammatory and regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2008;181:8391–401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Allavena P,
    2. Garlanda C,
    3. Borrello MG,
    4. Sica A,
    5. Mantovani A
    . Pathways connecting inflammation and cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2008;18:3–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Barbie DA,
    2. Tamayo P,
    3. Boehm JS,
    4. Kim SY,
    5. Moody SE,
    6. Dunn IF,
    7. et al
    . Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature 2009;462:108–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Engelman JA,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Tan X,
    4. Crosby K,
    5. Guimaraes AR,
    6. Upadhyay R,
    7. et al
    . Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat Med 2008;14:1351–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Protopopov A,
    2. Feng B,
    3. Chin L
    . Full complexity genomic hybridization on 60-mer oligonucleotide microarrays for array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Methods Mol Biol 2008;439:87–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Aguirre AJ,
    2. Bardeesy N,
    3. Sinha M,
    4. Lopez L,
    5. Tuveson DA,
    6. Horner J,
    7. et al
    . Activated Kras and Ink4a/Arf deficiency cooperate to produce metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev 2003;17:3112–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Schreiber FS,
    2. Deramaudt TB,
    3. Brunner TB,
    4. Boretti MI,
    5. Gooch KJ,
    6. Stoffers DA,
    7. et al
    . Successful growth and characterization of mouse pancreatic ductal cells: functional properties of the Ki-RAS(G12V) oncogene. Gastroenterology 2004;127:250–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Bardeesy N,
    2. Morgan J,
    3. Sinha M,
    4. Signoretti S,
    5. Srivastava S,
    6. Loda M,
    7. et al
    . Obligate roles for p16(Ink4a) and p19(Arf)-p53 in the suppression of murine pancreatic neoplasia. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:635–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Discovery: 1 (2)
July 2011
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Discovery article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PTEN Is a Major Tumor Suppressor in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Regulates an NF-κB–Cytokine Network
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Discovery
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Discovery.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
PTEN Is a Major Tumor Suppressor in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Regulates an NF-κB–Cytokine Network
Haoqiang Ying, Kutlu G. Elpek, Anant Vinjamoori, Stephanie M. Zimmerman, Gerald C. Chu, Haiyan Yan, Eliot Fletcher-Sananikone, Hailei Zhang, Yingchun Liu, Wei Wang, Xiaojia Ren, Hongwu Zheng, Alec C. Kimmelman, Ji-hye Paik, Carol Lim, Samuel R. Perry, Shan Jiang, Brian Malinn, Alexei Protopopov, Simona Colla, Yonghong Xiao, Aram F. Hezel, Nabeel Bardeesy, Shannon J. Turley, Y. Alan Wang, Lynda Chin, Sarah P. Thayer and Ronald A. DePinho
Cancer Discov July 1 2011 (1) (2) 158-169; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0031

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PTEN Is a Major Tumor Suppressor in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Regulates an NF-κB–Cytokine Network
Haoqiang Ying, Kutlu G. Elpek, Anant Vinjamoori, Stephanie M. Zimmerman, Gerald C. Chu, Haiyan Yan, Eliot Fletcher-Sananikone, Hailei Zhang, Yingchun Liu, Wei Wang, Xiaojia Ren, Hongwu Zheng, Alec C. Kimmelman, Ji-hye Paik, Carol Lim, Samuel R. Perry, Shan Jiang, Brian Malinn, Alexei Protopopov, Simona Colla, Yonghong Xiao, Aram F. Hezel, Nabeel Bardeesy, Shannon J. Turley, Y. Alan Wang, Lynda Chin, Sarah P. Thayer and Ronald A. DePinho
Cancer Discov July 1 2011 (1) (2) 158-169; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0031
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Methods
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Glioblastoma Homeostasis Revealed by Synthetic Genetic Tracing
  • Cell of Origin Affects PDAC Subtype
  • Poor Survival and Genetic Features of Black Patients with AML
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • OnlineFirst
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info For

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Discovery

  • About the Journal
  • Editors
  • Journal Sections
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Discovery
eISSN: 2159-8290
ISSN: 2159-8274

Advertisement