Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Journal Sections
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Precision Medicine and Therapeutic Resistance
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immuno-oncology
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
    • Journal Press Releases
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • 10th Anniversary
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Discovery
Cancer Discovery
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Journal Sections
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Precision Medicine and Therapeutic Resistance
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immuno-oncology
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
    • Journal Press Releases
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • 10th Anniversary
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Watch

New Single-Cell Screening Method Finds Immunotherapy Response Modulator

DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-RW2021-037
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
  • Major Finding: The single-cell approach Perturb-CITE-seq identified CD58 as influencing immune checkpoint blockade.

  • Concept: Perturb-CITE-seq combines genetic screening with transcriptomic and cell-surface protein analysis.

  • Impact: This work highlights this method's use and suggests a role for CD58 in ICI response and resistance.


Embedded Image

Understanding mechanisms of intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is critical to the development of methods to circumvent this obstacle. To address this, Frangieh, Melms, Thakore, Geiger-Schuller, and colleagues developed a method dubbed Perturb-CITE-seq, which combines the systematic CRISPR–Cas9- based single-cell transcriptomic genetic screening technique Perturb-seq with the single-cell approach CITE-seq, which enables transcriptomic profiling alongside measurement of cell-surface proteins. Using Perturb-CITE-seq, 248 genes associated with intrinsic ICI resistance were systematically targeted with 744 CRISPR–Cas9- based knockouts (KO), and then single-cell transcriptomic profiling and measurement of 20 relevant cell-surface proteins, with the final number of cells included in the analysis being approximately 218,000. In coculture experiments combining patient-derived melanoma cells and ex vivo expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, a viability screen (to assess the knockouts' effects on T-cell mediated antitumor immunity) was combined with Perturb-CITE-seq (to ascertain the mechanisms underlying effects seen in the viability screen). In addition to identifying genes anticipated to be involved in immune evasion based on clinical and preclinical data, B2M, HLA-A, JAK1, JAK2, STAT1, IFNGR1, and IFNGR2 conferred resistance to T cell–mediated killing. Interestingly, genetic perturbation of CD58 (also known as LFA3)—encoding a cell-surface protein typically expressed on antigen-presenting cells that acts as a ligand for T-cell and natural killer–cell CD2—was also a hit in the Perturb-CITE-seq screen. Mechanistically, IFNγ signaling did not affect CD58 protein expression, and MHC expression was not altered by CD58 perturbation, implying that CD58 loss-of-function mutations do not promote immune escape via the same mechanisms as other known mutations. Notably, patient data showed that levels of CD58 mRNA were lower in ICI-resistant melanomas than in ICI-naïve melanomas. Collectively, this study demonstrates the utility of Perturb-CITE-seq for biological research, including on cancer, and identifies CD58 as a potential modulator of immunotherapy response.

Frangieh CJ, Melms JC, Thakore PI, Geiger-Schuller KR, Ho P, Luoma AM, et al. Multimodal pooled Perturb-CITE-seq screens in patient models define mechanisms of cancer immune evasion. Nat Genet 2021;53:332–41.

Notes

Note: Research Watch is written by Cancer Discovery editorial staff. Readers are encouraged to consult the original articles for full details. For more Research Watch, visit Cancer Discovery online at http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/CDNews.

  • ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.
PreviousNext
Back to top

This OnlineFirst version was published on March 12, 2021
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-RW2021-037

View this article with LENS

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Discovery article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
New Single-Cell Screening Method Finds Immunotherapy Response Modulator
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Discovery
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Discovery.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
New Single-Cell Screening Method Finds Immunotherapy Response Modulator
Cancer Discov March 12 2021 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-RW2021-037

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
New Single-Cell Screening Method Finds Immunotherapy Response Modulator
Cancer Discov March 12 2021 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-RW2021-037
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Notes
  • Info & Metrics
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cell-Intrinsic Programs Partition Nutrients in Tumor Microenvironment
  • Extrachromosomal DNA Can Promote Oncogene Transcription in Trans
  • Transient Rest Reverses Exhaustion of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells
Show more Research Watch
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • OnlineFirst
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info For

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Discovery

  • About the Journal
  • Editors
  • Journal Sections
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Discovery
eISSN: 2159-8290
ISSN: 2159-8274

Advertisement