Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Journal Sections
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Precision Medicine and Therapeutic Resistance
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immuno-oncology
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
    • Journal Press Releases
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • 10th Anniversary
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Discovery
Cancer Discovery
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Journal Sections
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Precision Medicine and Therapeutic Resistance
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immuno-oncology
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
    • Journal Press Releases
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • 10th Anniversary
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

News in Brief

Radionuclide Reduces PSA in mCRPC

DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2021-0325
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

A phase II trial recently revealed that 177Lu-PSMA-617 is almost twice as likely to elicit a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response as chemotherapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In the TheraP trial, patients treated with the agent also had a higher objective response rate (ORR) and were less likely to experience severe side effects. Findings were presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary (GU) Cancers Symposium, held virtually February 11–13, and simultaneously published (The Lancet 2021;397:797–804).

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a glycoprotein overexpressed on the surface of prostate cancer cells. A small radionuclide, 177Lu-PSMA-617 consists of PSMA-617, which binds with high affinity to PSMA, and lutetium-177, which releases beta radiation that destroys PSMA-expressing cells. In a single-arm phase II trial, patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 had a median overall survival (OS) of 13.3 months (Lancet Oncol 2018;19:825–33). TheraP builds on these results by comparing 177Lu-PSMA-617 to cabazitaxel (Jevtana; Sanofi), the current standard of care.

At ASCO GU, lead author Michael Hofman, MBBS, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne, Australia, reported on 200 men with mCRPC who received either 177Lu-PSMA-617 or cabazitaxel. All participants had previously received docetaxel and had an increasing PSA level that was at least 20 ng/ml; more than 90% of them had received prior antiandrogen therapy.

Patients in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 arm had an ORR of 49% and a PSA response—defined as a 50% or greater reduction in PSA—of 66%, compared with 24% and 37% for patients in the cabazitaxel arm. At 12 months, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 19% for patients treated with the radiopharmaceutical, compared with 3% for those treated with cabazitaxel. However, both groups had a median PFS of 5.1 months, “demonstrating that the treatment effect was not constant with respect to time,” Hofman said.

177Lu-PSMA-617 was associated with fewer severe side effects: 33% of patients treated with the agent had grade 3/4 adverse events and 1% discontinued treatment, compared with 53% and 4%, respectively, of patients who received cabazitaxel. Thrombocytopenia and pain were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events caused by 177Lu-PSMA-617, each occurring in 11% of patients.

“A strength of the study is an active control arm using cabazitaxel, a validated life-prolonging therapy,” Hofman said. He concluded that 177Lu-PSMA-617 appears to be significantly more active than cabazitaxel, and thus “represents a new class of effective therapy for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer.” TheraP will continue to gather OS data, and 177Lu-PSMA-617 will undergo additional testing in the upcoming phase III VISION trial.

Anthony D'Amico, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA, who was not involved in the trial, is “cautiously optimistic” about the results. “I think the science is valid, and I think it's a wonderful targeted treatment,” he said, noting the agent's minimal toxicity.

He added that “there probably is a benefit over cabazitaxel,” but several limitations associated with the relatively small size of a phase II trial make it difficult to assess the magnitude of the difference. Chiefly, patients in the cabazitaxel group had a higher dropout rate than those in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group, and they were almost twice as likely to have visceral metastases going into the trial—factors that may have contributed to their poorer outcomes.

Thus, D’Amico said, OS data and results from the phase III trial will be key. “I'd like to see it work. We just need the level one evidence to move it forward.” –Catherine Caruso

  • ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.
PreviousNext
Back to top

This OnlineFirst version was published on March 16, 2021
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2021-0325

View this article with LENS

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Discovery article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radionuclide Reduces PSA in mCRPC
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Discovery
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Discovery.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Radionuclide Reduces PSA in mCRPC
Cancer Discov March 16 2021 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2021-0325

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radionuclide Reduces PSA in mCRPC
Cancer Discov March 16 2021 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2021-0325
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Immunotherapy Activates Antitumor γ9δ2 T Cells
  • Mechanisms of KRAS Inhibitor Resistance Revealed
  • Genomic Differences by Race Emerge in Colorectal Cancer
Show more News in Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • OnlineFirst
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info For

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Discovery

  • About the Journal
  • Editors
  • Journal Sections
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Discovery
eISSN: 2159-8290
ISSN: 2159-8274

Advertisement